The Crioll Family

Beatrice (de Crioll) de Gyse

Father: Simon de Crioll

Mother: Maud (de Esseford) de Crioll

Married: Anselm de Gyse
This marriage must have occurred by 1279, when Anselm is recorded as holding part of the vill of Staughton, which was brought into the marriage by Beatrice.

Anselm was the son of Nicholas de Gyse. In 1274(5) he was a constable of the Tower of London. Anselm died on 7 February 1294(5).

Calendar of the Charter Rolls vol 2 Henry III - Edward I 1257-1300 p74 (1906)
1267. April 20.
Cambridge.
  Grant to Anselm de Gyse, and his heirs, of a weekly market on Friday at his manor of Aspele, co. Bedford, and of a yearly fair there on the vigil and the feast of St. Botolph and the two days following; grant also of free warren in the demesne lands of the said manor.

Calendar of Fine Rolls vol 1 Edward I 1272-1307 p39 (1911)
1275. Jan. 21.
Clarendon.
  Commitment during pleasure to Anthony Bek of the Tower of London, so that he render as much as Philip Basset, deceased, sometime constable, and other constables used to render.
  Order to Anselm de Gyse to deliver the Tower to the said Anthony or his attorney.

Calendar of the Close Rolls Edward I 1272-1279 p191 (1900)
1275. June 20.
Westminster.
  To the treasurer and barons of the exchequer. Order to cause Anselm Westmiuster. de Gyse to be acquitted of 20s. in which he made fine before the justices of the Bench, in the second year of the king’s reign, for a fine to be levied before the said justices, and to cause to be restored to him anything that may have been received from him for this fine, as the king has pardoned him the fine.
p356
1276. Oct. 15.
Westminster.
  Enrolment of giant from Anselm de Gyse, knight, to Sir Waller de Helyun, for his service and for 23 marks paid beforehand, of his meadow near Dunye in Munestreworth, which Anselm had of the gift of Sir John de Burgo; rendering therefor 1d. yearly for all service, etc. Witnesses: Sir Richard Fokeram, Sir Giles de Berkl[eye], knights; Ralph de Abbehal, Richard de Byseleye, Elias de Heydon, Ralph de Redleye, Ralph Barun.

Translations and Reprints from the Original Sources of European History vol 4 no.3 pp22-3 (1897)
  2. FROM THE ENGLISH HUNDRED ROLLS, A. D. 1279.
    Rotuli Hundredorum, II, 862, 673, and 681 ff. Latin.
... Sir Adam de Cretinges holds and accounts in the vill of Stoughton, for four knights’ fees from the bishop of Lincoln, and the bishop from the king. The same Adam holds by homage and scutage, when it runs, and has in demesne 13 score acres of arable land and 3 messuages of 2 acres, and 40 acres of woods and 7 acres of meadow and 10 acres of separable pasture.
      11 villains, each with a virgate of 20 acres, a house and some meadow, and each performing certain weekly works, ploughing, etc.
      16 cottars, each with a cottage and a rood of land, and each paying 12d. a year and performing certain labor.
      1 cottar with a half acre, and 2 with houses only.
  Sir Anselm de Gyse holds and accounts for two knights’ fees, from the same Adam for half a mark a year and for scutage when it happens; and he has in his garden, with a house and vineyard, 6 acres of land; and of arable land 13 score acre,s and in meadows 7 acres, and in separable pasture 10 acres and in woods 8 acres.
      6 villains, each with 20 acres, etc., as above.
  The prior of Bissemede holds one knight’s fee from the said Anselm and pays to him scutage when it happens. The same prior has in his garden with the house 8 acres, and 5 score acres of arable land, and 8 acres of woods and 8 acres of meadow, and 6 acres of separable pasture.
      5 free tenants with a total of 63¼ acres of arable land, etc.
      3 villains with a total of 1¼ virgates.
      5 cottars each with a cottage.
  Geoffrey, son of Everard of Stoughton holds half a knight’s fee from the said Anselm for homage and foreign service, and has in demesne 6 score acres of arable land, and in garden with a messuage one acre and a half and 4 acres of woods and 2 acres of separable pasture.
      1 free holder with 6 acres.
  William Schohisfoot holds the twelfth part of one knight’s fee from the aforesaid Anselm for homage and foreign service, and has in garden with the house one acre and a a half, and in arable land 20 acres, and 3 acres of meadow; and he ought to have common with his beasts in the meadow which is called Mora.
  William Dingle holds from the said William one acre and a half of land, and pays annually 1d.
      Various free and villein tenants holding immediately and mediately from Sir Adam de Cretinges.

Calendar of the Patent Rolls Edward I 1281-1292 p272 (1893)
1287. June 24.
Westminster.
  Protection, with clause volumus, for the following going to Wales on the king’s service:—
...
  Anselm de Gyse, going with John de Warrenna, earl of Surrey    -  Until Michaelmas

Calendar of the Charter Rolls vol 2 Henry III - Edward I 1257-1300 p435 (1906)
1294. June 8.
Westminster.
  Grant to Anselm de Gyse, and his heirs, of free warren in all his demesne lands in Elmore, co. Gloucester, and Wilmynton and Sutton by Derteford, co. Kent.   By K. on the information of G. de Badlesmere.

Calendar of Fine Rolls vol 1 Edward I 1272-1307 p350 (1911)
1295. Feb. 15.
Conway.
  Order to the same to take into the king’s hand the lands late of Anselm de Gyses, deceased, tenant in chief.

Calendar of Inquisitions Post Mortem vol 3 Edward I 1291-1300 pp172-3 (1912)
275. ANSELM DE GYSE alias DE GISE.
   Writ, 10 Feb. 23 Edw. I.
KENT. Inq. Friday the feast of the Annunciation, 23 Edw. I.
  La Ruehille. A manor (extent given) held of Sir William de Grandissono in chief by service of 35s. 10d. yearly, and suit at his court of Derteford every three weeks.
  John his son, aged 18, is his next heir; but this manor is divisible, and all his sons are heirs, but the age of the other sons is unknown.
GLOUCESTER. Inq. Saturday after the Invention of the Holy Cross, 23 Edw. I.
  Elmore. A messuage &c., a dovecot, 320a. arable, 20a. meadow, 2a. wood, a several fishery, a windmill, 50s. 11½d. rents of freemen, 40s. of rent called ‘watergavel,’ works &c. worth 114s., and 20s. pleas &c. of court, held of Lady Hawis de Greyli, one of the heirs of Sir John de Burgh, rendering a clove gillyflower yearly for all service.
  John his son, aged 17 ... . Barnabas the Apostle, 22 Edw. I, is his next heir.
BEDFORD. Inq. taken at the chapel of Wouburn, 8 April, 23 [Edw. I].
  Asple. The manor (extent given with details of services), including rents of 1lb. pepper from the lord of Saleford, 1lb. cummin from Geoffrey Grigori, ½lb. cummin from Gilbert son of Elias Parnel, a pair of spurs from Geoffrey Grigori, and 12d. for a cottage from Richard le Juvene, held in chief of Hawis late the wife of Robert de Greyli by service of ½ knight’s fee.
  He held nothing of the king in chief in the county.
  He died on 7 Feb. 23 Edw. I. Heir as above, aged 17 and more.
Writ of plenius certiorari to the treasurer &c. of the exchequer directing them to search the rolls of the exchequer and inform the king whether they find that the said Anselm held nothing of the king in chief, 18 May, 23 Edw. I.
          C. Edw. I. File 71. (22.)

Calendar of the Close Rolls Edward I 1288-1296 p414 (1904)
1295. June 25.
Oswestry (Album Monasterium.)
  To Malcolm de Harle, escheator this side Trent. Order not to intermeddle further with the lands that Anselm de Gyse held at his death, and to restore the issues thereof, as the king learns by inquisition taken by the escheator and also by a writ of exchequer that Anselm at his death held nothing of the king in chief by reason whereof the custody of his lands ought to pertain to the king.

Transactions - Bristol and Gloucestershire Archaeological Society for 1878-9 vol 3 pp49-54 (1912)
      ELMORE AND THE FAMILY OF GUISE,
        By SIR JOHN MACLEAN, F.S.A.,
  OUR attention was first attracted to this subject by observing, when on a visit at Elmore, mounted and framed, and hung up in the drawing room, a duplicate of the original Charter by which John, son of the famous Hubert de Burgh, Karl of Kent, granted to Anselme de Gyse, for his homage and service, all the manor of Elmore, to be held to the said Anselme, and the heirs of his body for ever, of the said John and his heirs, by the payment of unum clavum gariophili at Easter. This Charter is undated, and among the muniments, at Elmore is the original, with the seal, in white wax, attached. The seal is much broken at the edges, otherwise it is in fair condition. On the obverse it bears the figure of a mounted knight, brandishing his sword, his shield, and the mantlings of his horse being charged with the arms of de Burgh: lozengy, gules and vair. A portion of the legend is broken away. On the reverse side are the arms of de Burgh, on a heater-shaped shield, surrounded by the words SIGILLUM SECRETI. Though this charter is without date, we can fix the time at which it was made, for on a search at the Public Record Office we were so fortunate as to discover the fine passed for the warranty of the Charter. It was levied on the morrow of the Ascension of our Lord, 1274, and for this fine Anselme de Gyse gave the said John de Burgh one soare sparrowhawk (unum sparvarium sorum), sorum signifying a reddish colour, denoting the age of the bird, that is to say, a young hawk. It is, however, somewhat remarkable that the fine differs from the Charter in respect to the rent reserved, it being stated in the former to be a pair of gilt spurs (calcarium de auratorum), but that the fine in this particular was erroneous we shall see by subsequent documents.
...  Anselme de Gyse, the grantee of the manor of Elmore, as mentioned above, is shewn in the pedigree as fourth in descent, or great grandson, of the aforesaid Guy. He died on 7th Feb. 1294-5, and it appears from the Inquisition taken thereupon for the county of Bedford, that he died seized of the manor of Aspeley, which he held in Capite of Hawisia, who was the wife of Robert de Greli, by the service of one knight’s fee. From the Inquisition taken on the same occasion for the county of Kent, it appears that the said Anselme held a manor called Ruchille, in that county, of Sir William de Grandisson, in capite, by the service of 31s. 10d. per annum, and suit at the court of the Manor of Derteford, and the jurors say that John, son of the said Anselme, is his nearest heir, and is aged 18 years; but, they say, the same manor is divisible, and that all the sons of the said Anselme are heirs, but of the ages of the other sons they are ignorant. The Inquisition most interesting to us, however, is that taken for the county of Gloucester, inasmuch as the extent of the Manor of Elmore, with all its franchises, is shewn in great detail, together with the value of the same:—The jurors say that the said Anselme held in the ville of Elmore, one messuage, with garden and courtlage, and the value per annum is 6s. 8d.; they say, there is also one dovecot, and the value per annum is 2s. He held there in demesne xvj acres of arable land, and the value per acre per annum is iiijd, total 106s. 8d.; he held there 20 acres of meadow, value each acre per annum 2s., total 40s.; they say there are also there 2 acres of wood and underwood, worth nil.; there are there several fisheries, value per annum, £1 13s. 4d.; there is there one windmill, and the value per annum is 6s. 8d. There are there free rents of assize to the value of 50s. 11½d.; paid at the feast of St. Michael, 38s. 11½d.; and at the feast of St. John Baptist, 12s.; and there is there a rent which is called water gavel, per annum, 40s., paid at the feast of Purilication, B.V.M.; works and customs, value per annum, 114s; which is paid at the feast of the Nativity of the Blessed Mary in autumn, 11s.; at the feast of St. Michael, 17s.; at the feast of St. Andrew, 20s.; at the Nativity of our Lord, 29s.; and at Easter floridum (Palm Sunday), 20s.; and at the feast of St. John Baptist, 17s.; pleas and perquisites of Courts, value per annum, 20s.; total value per annum, £24 0s. 3½d. And the jurors say that the said Anselme held all the aforesaid tenements of Lady Hawisia de Greyli, one of the heirs of John de Burgh, at the rent of unum clavum gariophili for all services.

Children: Notes:
Beatrice and her sisters, Nichola and Margery, are named as daughters of Maud (Matilda) de Crioll (Kuriel) in a confirmation of a donation to the church of the manor of Blaysworth.
Monasticon Anglicanum vol 6 p283 (William Dugdale, 1846)
Cartae ad Prioratum de Bissemede in agro Bedfordiensi spectantes.
...    NUM. VI.
Carta Dominarum de Stoktone, prædictam Donationem de Manerio de Blaysworth confirmans.
    [Ibid. f. 63 b.]
  OMNIBUS sanctæ matris ecclesiæ filiis ad quos præsens scriptum pervenerit, Nicholaa, Margeria, et Beatrix, dominæ de magna Stoktone, et filiæ Matildis de Kuriel, salutem in Domino sempiternam. Noveritis, quod cum domina Isabella Pauncefot dederit et cartâ suâ confirmaverit Deo et ecclesiæ beatæ Mariæ de Bishemede, priori et canonicis ibidum Deo servientibus et in perpetuum servituris, manerium suum de Blaysworth, cum hominibus et tenentibus et omnibus aliis pertinentiis suis; salvis dominis feodi serviciis et consuetudinibus inde eis debitis et consuetis, sicut in carta ipsa, quam vidimus et plenariò intelleximus, pleniùs continetur. Nos considerantes benevolentiam et affectum dominæ quondam Matildis de Kuriel matris nostræ, in dicta ecclesia tumulatæ quæ erga dictum locum et canonicos habuit; ac idem manerium in sectis curiæ et relevio pro uno feodo militis nobis teneatur ad remotionem cujusque prioris de Bishemede, et in aliis serviciis diversis; pro salute animæ ejusdem matris nostræ et animarum nostrarum; et animæ Rogeri de Rollinges, et antecessorum et successorum nostrorum, pro nobis et hæredibus, seu quibuscunque assignatis et successoribus nostris, remisimus et quietum clamavimus prædictis canonicis relevia prædicta et sectas prædictas eidem priori et canonicis imperpetuum, &c. In cujus, &c.
which translates roughly as:
Charters pertaining to the Priory of Bissemede in Bedfordshire.
...   No. 6.
Charter of the Ladies of Stockton, confirming the aforesaid Donation of the Manor of Blaysworth.
    [Ibid. f. 63 b.]
  TO all the children of the holy mother of the church to whom this inscription has been reached, Nichola, Margery, and Beatrice, mistresses of Great Stockton, and daughters of Matilda de Kuriel, greetings in the Lord for ever. You shall know that when Lady Isabel Pauncefot gave and confirmed by her charter to God and to the church of blessed Mary of Bishemede, prior and canons there serving God, and will serve forever, her manor of Blaysworth, with men and tenants and all their other appurtenances; except to the owners of the fee for the services and customs due and customary from them, as is contained more fully in the charter itself, which we have seen and fully understood. We reflect on the benevolence and affection of our former mistress Matilda de Kuriel, our mother, buried in the said church which had respect to the said place and canons; and that the same manor in the suits of the court and relief is bound to us for one knight's fee for the removal of each former from Bishemede, and in different services; for the salvation of the soul of our mother and of our souls; and to the souls of Roger de Rollinges, and our ancestors and successors, on behalf of us and our heirs, or any of our assigns and successors, we have remitted and quitted the aforesaid canonical reliefs and the aforesaid sects to the same prior and canons in perpetuity, &c. In whose, &c.

The following extract from the Close Rolls appears to show that Beatrice was a sister of Nicholas de Crioll, and thus a daughter of Nicholas's father, also Nicholas. I am persuaded, however, that an error in the extraction or translation has occurred and the extract should read "sisters of Nicholaa de Cryoll" rather than "sisters of Nicholas de Cryoll". This view is supported by the entry in the Patent Rolls regarding Nicholas's lawsuit that more clearly states that Beatrice and Margery are sisters of Nicholaa.
Calendar of the Patent Rolls 2 Edward I 1273-1274 p536 (1882)
m. 2d. (57).  Stockton (“Stocton”) (Hunts); appointment of Geoffrey de Leukenore and John de Mettingham to take the assise of mort dancestor arraigned by Nicholas de Crioyll’ against Nicholaa de Crioyll’, Margery and Beatrix her sisters, touching a moiety of the manor of.
Calendar of the Close Rolls Edward I 1272-1279 p92 (1900)
1274. July 17.
Westminster.
  To Master R. de Cliff[ord], escheator this side Trent. Order to cause Nicholaa de Cryoll’, Margery and Beatrice, sisters of Nicholas de Cryoll’, tenant in chief, to have seisin of a moiety of the manor of Stocton, together with the issues thereof, as the escheator, believing that Nicholas was seised at his death of the said moiety in his demesne as of fee ejected Nicholaa, Margery and Beatrice from their seisin thereof and took it into the king’s hands, and the king learns by inquisition taken by the escheator that Nicholas at his death was not seised of a moiety of the manor, because he had given it to Roger de Leyburn, and at the time when Nicholas held the moiety he held it of the bishop of Lincoln by the courtesy of England of the inheritance of his first wife.

Calendar of the Close Rolls Edward I 1296-1302 p194 (1904)
1298. Feb. 10.
Langley.
  Fulk de Lucy acknowledges that he owes to Beatrice, late the wife of Anselm de Gyse, and executrix of his will, 20 marks; to be levied, in default of payment, of his lands and chattels in co. Warwick.

In October 1313 Beatrice's son, John, sold the manor of Aspele in Bedfordshire, a third of which Beatrice still held in dower.
Feet of Fines: CP 25/1/285/24
CP 25/1/3/42, number 18.
Link:  Image of document at AALT
County:  Bedfordshire.
Place:  Westminster.
Date:  Two weeks from St Michael, 7 Edward II [13 October 1313]
Parties:  Robert Louet, querent, and John de Gyse the elder, deforciant.
Property:  The manor of Aspele, of which John de Triple and John le Luter hold 2 parts for their lives and Beatrice de Gyse the third part in dower.
Action:  Plea of covenant.
Agreement:  Robert has acknowledged the manor to be the right of John.
For this:  John has granted for himself and his heirs that the 2 parts - which John de Triple and John le Luter held for their lives - and also that the third part - which Beatrice held in dower - of the inheritance of John de Gyse on the day the agreement was made, and which 2 parts after the decease of John de Triple and John le Luter and the third part after the decease of Beatrice ought to revert to John de Gyse and his heirs - after the decease of John de Triple and John le Luter and Beatrice shall remain to Robert, to hold of John de Gyse and his heirs for the life of Robert, rendering yearly 1 rose at the feast of the Nativity of St John the Baptist, and doing to the chief lords all other services. And after the decease of Robert the manor shall remain to John, son of John de Gyse, and Margaret, his wife, and the heirs begotten by John on the body of Margaret, to hold of the aforesaid John de Gyse the elder and his heirs for ever, rendering yearly 1 rose at the feast of the Nativity of St John the Baptist, and doing to the chief lords all other services. In default of such heirs, the manor shall revert to the aforesaid John de Gyse and his heirs, quit of the other heirs of John, son of John, and Margaret, to hold of the chief lords for ever..
Note:  This agreement was made in the presence of John de Triple and John le Luter and Beatrice, and they did fealty to Robert in the court.

Beatrix was alive at least until 1327.
Transactions - Bristol and Gloucestershire Archaeological Society for 1878-9 vol 3 p54 (1912)
      ELMORE AND THE FAMILY OF GUISE,
        By SIR JOHN MACLEAN, F.S.A.,
... In 1313-4 a fine was levied between William de Lamborne quer., and John de Gyse, senr., def, of the Manor of Elmor, &c, whereby two parts of the said manor were settled upon the said John, and the third part, which Beatrix who was the wife of Anselme de Gyse held in dower, was to revert to the said John after the death of the said Beatrix, with remainder to John the son of the said John, and the heirs of his body, in default of such issue, remainder to the right heirs of the aforesaid John de Gyse, senior.
  We do not know the date of the death of John de Gyse, sen., but Beatrix was alive in 1327, for in that year John de Gyse was assessed to the subsidy at the rate of 7s. 3d., and Beatrix de Gyse at the rate of 6s. 8¾d. upon lands in Elmore.

The VCH  History of the County of Huntingdonshire confuses Simon and Nicholas de Crioll, incorrectly stating the latter to Beatrice's father.
A History of the County of Huntingdon vol 2 pp354-369 (1932)
GREAT STAUGHTON
It would appear that Nicholas de Crioll married firstly Maud, probably the daughter of William de Eynesford, by whom he had three daughters, Nicholaa, Margery, and Beatrice, and secondly Joan, daughter and heir of William de Auberville of Eynesford (co. Kent), by whom he had a son Nicholas, a minor at the time of his father's death in 1273. Of the daughters, who inherited their mother's property, Nicholaa married Adam de Creting, Margery seems to have died unmarried, and Beatrice married Anselm de Gyse.

Sources:

Margery de Crioll

Father: Simon de Crioll

Mother: Maud (de Esseford) de Crioll

Notes:
Margery and her sisters, Nichola and Beatrice, are named as daughters of Maud (Matilda) de Crioll (Kuriel) in a confirmation of a donation to the church of the manor of Blaysworth.
Monasticon Anglicanum vol 6 p283 (William Dugdale, 1846)
Cartae ad Prioratum de Bissemede in agro Bedfordiensi spectantes.
...    NUM. VI.
Carta Dominarum de Stoktone, prædictam Donationem de Manerio de Blaysworth confirmans.
    [Ibid. f. 63 b.]
  OMNIBUS sanctæ matris ecclesiæ filiis ad quos præsens scriptum pervenerit, Nicholaa, Margeria, et Beatrix, dominæ de magna Stoktone, et filiæ Matildis de Kuriel, salutem in Domino sempiternam. Noveritis, quod cum domina Isabella Pauncefot dederit et cartâ suâ confirmaverit Deo et ecclesiæ beatæ Mariæ de Bishemede, priori et canonicis ibidum Deo servientibus et in perpetuum servituris, manerium suum de Blaysworth, cum hominibus et tenentibus et omnibus aliis pertinentiis suis; salvis dominis feodi serviciis et consuetudinibus inde eis debitis et consuetis, sicut in carta ipsa, quam vidimus et plenariò intelleximus, pleniùs continetur. Nos considerantes benevolentiam et affectum dominæ quondam Matildis de Kuriel matris nostræ, in dicta ecclesia tumulatæ quæ erga dictum locum et canonicos habuit; ac idem manerium in sectis curiæ et relevio pro uno feodo militis nobis teneatur ad remotionem cujusque prioris de Bishemede, et in aliis serviciis diversis; pro salute animæ ejusdem matris nostræ et animarum nostrarum; et animæ Rogeri de Rollinges, et antecessorum et successorum nostrorum, pro nobis et hæredibus, seu quibuscunque assignatis et successoribus nostris, remisimus et quietum clamavimus prædictis canonicis relevia prædicta et sectas prædictas eidem priori et canonicis imperpetuum, &c. In cujus, &c.
which translates roughly as:
Charters pertaining to the Priory of Bissemede in Bedfordshire.
...   No. 6.
Charter of the Ladies of Stockton, confirming the aforesaid Donation of the Manor of Blaysworth.
    [Ibid. f. 63 b.]
  TO all the children of the holy mother of the church to whom this inscription has been reached, Nichola, Margery, and Beatrice, mistresses of Great Stockton, and daughters of Matilda de Kuriel, greetings in the Lord for ever. You shall know that when Lady Isabel Pauncefot gave and confirmed by her charter to God and to the church of blessed Mary of Bishemede, prior and canons there serving God, and will serve forever, her manor of Blaysworth, with men and tenants and all their other appurtenances; except to the owners of the fee for the services and customs due and customary from them, as is contained more fully in the charter itself, which we have seen and fully understood. We reflect on the benevolence and affection of our former mistress Matilda of Kuriel, our mother, buried in the said church which had respect to the said place and canons; and that the same manor in the suits of the court and relief is bound to us for one knight's fee for the removal of each former from Bishemede, and in different services; for the salvation of the soul of our mother and of our souls; and to the souls of Roger de Rollinges, and our ancestors and successors, on behalf of us and our heirs, or any of our assigns and successors, we have remitted and quitted the aforesaid canonical reliefs and the aforesaid sects to the same prior and canons in perpetuity, &c. In whose, &c.

The following extract from the Close Rolls appears to show that Margery was a sister of Nicholas de Crioll, and thus a daughter of Nicholas's father, also Nicholas. I am persuaded, however, that an error in the extraction or translation has occurred and the extract should read "sisters of Nicholaa de Cryoll" rather than "sisters of Nicholas de Cryoll". This view is supported by the entry in the Patent Rolls regarding Nicholas's lawsuit that more clearly states that Beatrice and Margery are sisters of Nicholaa.
Calendar of the Patent Rolls 2 Edward I 1273-1274 p536 (1882)
m. 2d. (57).  Stockton (“Stocton”) (Hunts); appointment of Geoffrey de Leukenore and John de Mettingham to take the assise of mort dancestor arraigned by Nicholas de Crioyll’ against Nicholaa de Crioyll’, Margery and Beatrix her sisters, touching a moiety of the manor of.
Calendar of the Close Rolls Edward I 1272-1279 p92 (1900)
1274. July 17.
Westminster.
  To Master R. de Cliff[ord], escheator this side Trent. Order to cause Nicholaa de Cryoll’, Margery and Beatrice, sisters of Nicholas de Cryoll’, tenant in chief, to have seisin of a moiety of the manor of Stocton, together with the issues thereof, as the escheator, believing that Nicholas was seised at his death of the said moiety in his demesne as of fee ejected Nicholaa, Margery and Beatrice from their seisin thereof and took it into the king’s hands, and the king learns by inquisition taken by the escheator that Nicholas at his death was not seised of a moiety of the manor, because he had given it to Roger de Leyburn, and at the time when Nicholas held the moiety he held it of the bishop of Lincoln by the courtesy of England of the inheritance of his first wife.

The VCH  History of the County of Huntingdonshire confuses Simon and Nicholas de Crioll, incorrectly stating the latter to Margery's father.
A History of the County of Huntingdon vol 2 pp354-369 (1932)
GREAT STAUGHTON
It would appear that Nicholas de Crioll married firstly Maud, probably the daughter of William de Eynesford, by whom he had three daughters, Nicholaa, Margery, and Beatrice, and secondly Joan, daughter and heir of William de Auberville of Eynesford (co. Kent), by whom he had a son Nicholas, a minor at the time of his father's death in 1273. Of the daughters, who inherited their mother's property, Nicholaa married Adam de Creting, Margery seems to have died unmarried, and Beatrice married Anselm de Gyse.

Sources:

Nichola (de Crioll) de Creting

Father: Simon de Crioll

Mother: Maud (de Esseford) de Crioll

Married: Adam de Creting
This marriage had occurred by 1276, when a deed records an agreement between Roger de Rolling (Nichola's stepfather) and "Adam de Cretinge and Nichola his wife" (A Descriptive Catalogue of Ancient Deeds vol 2 p551 Deed C.2362).

Children: Notes:
Nichola and her sisters, Margery and Beatrice, are named as daughters of Maud (Matilda) de Crioll (Kuriel) in a confirmation of a donation to the church of the manor of Blaysworth.
Monasticon Anglicanum vol 6 p283 (William Dugdale, 1846)
Cartae ad Prioratum de Bissemede in agro Bedfordiensi spectantes.
...    NUM. VI.
Carta Dominarum de Stoktone, prædictam Donationem de Manerio de Blaysworth confirmans.
    [Ibid. f. 63 b.]
  OMNIBUS sanctæ matris ecclesiæ filiis ad quos præsens scriptum pervenerit, Nicholaa, Margeria, et Beatrix, dominæ de magna Stoktone, et filiæ Matildis de Kuriel, salutem in Domino sempiternam. Noveritis, quod cum domina Isabella Pauncefot dederit et cartâ suâ confirmaverit Deo et ecclesiæ beatæ Mariæ de Bishemede, priori et canonicis ibidum Deo servientibus et in perpetuum servituris, manerium suum de Blaysworth, cum hominibus et tenentibus et omnibus aliis pertinentiis suis; salvis dominis feodi serviciis et consuetudinibus inde eis debitis et consuetis, sicut in carta ipsa, quam vidimus et plenariò intelleximus, pleniùs continetur. Nos considerantes benevolentiam et affectum dominæ quondam Matildis de Kuriel matris nostræ, in dicta ecclesia tumulatæ quæ erga dictum locum et canonicos habuit; ac idem manerium in sectis curiæ et relevio pro uno feodo militis nobis teneatur ad remotionem cujusque prioris de Bishemede, et in aliis serviciis diversis; pro salute animæ ejusdem matris nostræ et animarum nostrarum; et animæ Rogeri de Rollinges, et antecessorum et successorum nostrorum, pro nobis et hæredibus, seu quibuscunque assignatis et successoribus nostris, remisimus et quietum clamavimus prædictis canonicis relevia prædicta et sectas prædictas eidem priori et canonicis imperpetuum, &c. In cujus, &c.
which translates roughly as:
Charters pertaining to the Priory of Bissemede in Bedfordshire.
...   No. 6.
Charter of the Ladies of Stockton, confirming the aforesaid Donation of the Manor of Blaysworth.
    [Ibid. f. 63 b.]
  TO all the children of the holy mother of the church to whom this inscription has been reached, Nichola, Margery, and Beatrice, mistresses of Great Stockton, and daughters of Matilda de Kuriel, greetings in the Lord for ever. You shall know that when Lady Isabel Pauncefot gave and confirmed by her charter to God and to the church of blessed Mary of Bishemede, prior and canons there serving God, and will serve forever, her manor of Blaysworth, with men and tenants and all their other appurtenances; except to the owners of the fee for the services and customs due and customary from them, as is contained more fully in the charter itself, which we have seen and fully understood. We reflect on the benevolence and affection of our former mistress Matilda of Kuriel, our mother, buried in the said church which had respect to the said place and canons; and that the same manor in the suits of the court and relief is bound to us for one knight's fee for the removal of each former from Bishemede, and in different services; for the salvation of the soul of our mother and of our souls; and to the souls of Roger de Rollinges, and our ancestors and successors, on behalf of us and our heirs, or any of our assigns and successors, we have remitted and quitted the aforesaid canonical reliefs and the aforesaid sects to the same prior and canons in perpetuity, &c. In whose, &c.

The following extract from the Close Rolls appears to show that Nichola was a sister of Nicholas de Crioll, and thus a daughter of Nicholas's father, also Nicholas. I am persuaded, however, that an error in the extraction or translation has occurred and the extract should read "sisters of Nicholaa de Cryoll" rather than "sisters of Nicholas de Cryoll". This view is supported by the entry in the Patent Rolls regarding Nicholas's lawsuit that more clearly states that Beatrice and Margery are sisters of Nicholaa.
Calendar of the Patent Rolls 2 Edward I 1273-1274 p536 (1882)
m. 2d. (57).  Stockton (“Stocton”) (Hunts); appointment of Geoffrey de Leukenore and John de Mettingham to take the assise of mort dancestor arraigned by Nicholas de Crioyll’ against Nicholaa de Crioyll’, Margery and Beatrix her sisters, touching a moiety of the manor of.
Calendar of the Close Rolls Edward I 1272-1279 p92 (1900)
1274. July 17.
Westminster.
  To Master R. de Cliff[ord], escheator this side Trent. Order to cause Nicholaa de Cryoll’, Margery and Beatrice, sisters of Nicholas de Cryoll’, tenant in chief, to have seisin of a moiety of the manor of Stocton, together with the issues thereof, as the escheator, believing that Nicholas was seised at his death of the said moiety in his demesne as of fee ejected Nicholaa, Margery and Beatrice from their seisin thereof and took it into the king’s hands, and the king learns by inquisition taken by the escheator that Nicholas at his death was not seised of a moiety of the manor, because he had given it to Roger de Leyburn, and at the time when Nicholas held the moiety he held it of the bishop of Lincoln by the courtesy of England of the inheritance of his first wife.

Nichola is named as Adam's wife in Adam's IPM.
Calendar of Inquisitions Post Mortem vol 3 Edward I p384 (1912)
354. ADAM DE CRETING alias DE CRETYNGGE, DE CRETINGK.
Writ, 24 Sept. 26 Edw. I.
ESSEX. Inq. 30 June, 27 Edw. I.
  Rumford in Haveryngge. The said Adam and Nichola his wife were enfeoffed jointly of the manor by the king, to hold of him by service of ¼ knight’s fee, and the said Adam demised the manor to one Henry le Convers of Winchester, to hold of him and his heirs by service of ¼ knight’s fee and 1d. yearly; and the said Adam did the said service for his whole life to the king, and died in his homage.

The VCH  History of the County of Huntingdonshire confuses Simon and Nicholas de Crioll, incorrectly stating the latter to Nichola's father.
A History of the County of Huntingdon vol 2 pp354-369 (1932)
GREAT STAUGHTON
It would appear that Nicholas de Crioll married firstly Maud, probably the daughter of William de Eynesford, by whom he had three daughters, Nicholaa, Margery, and Beatrice, and secondly Joan, daughter and heir of William de Auberville of Eynesford (co. Kent), by whom he had a son Nicholas, a minor at the time of his father's death in 1273. Of the daughters, who inherited their mother's property, Nicholaa married Adam de Creting, Margery seems to have died unmarried, and Beatrice married Anselm de Gyse.

Sources:

Simon de Crioll

Married: Maud de Esseford
This marriage occurred before 18 October 1243, when a document refers to "Simon de Cryoyl and Maud his wife" (Calendar of the Patent Rolls Henry III 1232-1247 p398).

Children: Notes:
The ownership of the manor of Stocton (Staughton) around this time is complicated, but allows us to understand the ancestry of Nichola, Margery and Beatrice de Crioll. It appears that Nicholas de Crioll, the warden of the Cinque Ports, and a kinsman of Simon de Crioll, came into possession of the manor through his first wife, Joan de Auberville, daughter and heir of William de Auberville of Eynesford (co. Kent) and he, along with William Heringauld, representing another co-heir of William de Auberville held the manor in 1265 (Calendar of Inquisitions Miscellaneous (Chancery) vol 1 [Henry III and Edward I] p219). Nicholas and William sold the manor to Roger de Leyburne who, in 1271, exchanged it, for the manor of Ashford in Kent, with Maud, daughter of William de Eshetesford, now married to Roger Rolling (A Descriptive Catalogue of Ancient Deeds vol 5 p195 Deed A.11176). In 1274, Nicholaa, Margery and Beatrice de Crioll are documented as daughters of Maud de Crioll, and mistresses of Great Stockton.

Nichola and her sisters, Margery and Beatrice, are named as daughters of Maud (Matilda) de Crioll (Kuriel) in a confirmation of a donation to the church of the manor of Blaysworth, and as mistresses of Great Stockton, evidence that Nichola, Margery and Beatrice were daughters of Simon de Crioll and Maud (de Esseford) de Crioll.
Monasticon Anglicanum vol 6 p283 (William Dugdale, 1846)
Cartae ad Prioratum de Bissemede in agro Bedfordiensi spectantes.
...    NUM. VI.
Carta Dominarum de Stoktone, prædictam Donationem de Manerio de Blaysworth confirmans.
    [Ibid. f. 63 b.]
  OMNIBUS sanctæ matris ecclesiæ filiis ad quos præsens scriptum pervenerit, Nicholaa, Margeria, et Beatrix, dominæ de magna Stoktone, et filiæ Matildis de Kuriel, salutem in Domino sempiternam. Noveritis, quod cum domina Isabella Pauncefot dederit et cartâ suâ confirmaverit Deo et ecclesiæ beatæ Mariæ de Bishemede, priori et canonicis ibidum Deo servientibus et in perpetuum servituris, manerium suum de Blaysworth, cum hominibus et tenentibus et omnibus aliis pertinentiis suis; salvis dominis feodi serviciis et consuetudinibus inde eis debitis et consuetis, sicut in carta ipsa, quam vidimus et plenariò intelleximus, pleniùs continetur. Nos considerantes benevolentiam et affectum dominæ quondam Matildis de Kuriel matris nostræ, in dicta ecclesia tumulatæ quæ erga dictum locum et canonicos habuit; ac idem manerium in sectis curiæ et relevio pro uno feodo militis nobis teneatur ad remotionem cujusque prioris de Bishemede, et in aliis serviciis diversis; pro salute animæ ejusdem matris nostræ et animarum nostrarum; et animæ Rogeri de Rollinges, et antecessorum et successorum nostrorum, pro nobis et hæredibus, seu quibuscunque assignatis et successoribus nostris, remisimus et quietum clamavimus prædictis canonicis relevia prædicta et sectas prædictas eidem priori et canonicis imperpetuum, &c. In cujus, &c.
which translates roughly as:
Charters pertaining to the Priory of Bissemede in Bedfordshire.
...   No. 6.
Charter of the Ladies of Stockton, confirming the aforesaid Donation of the Manor of Blaysworth.
    [Ibid. f. 63 b.]
  TO all the children of the holy mother of the church to whom this inscription has been reached, Nichola, Margery, and Beatrice, mistresses of Great Stockton, and daughters of Matilda de Kuriel, greetings in the Lord for ever. You shall know that when Lady Isabel Pauncefot gave and confirmed by her charter to God and to the church of blessed Mary of Bishemede, prior and canons there serving God, and will serve forever, her manor of Blaysworth, with men and tenants and all their other appurtenances; except to the owners of the fee for the services and customs due and customary from them, as is contained more fully in the charter itself, which we have seen and fully understood. We reflect on the benevolence and affection of our former mistress Matilda of Kuriel, our mother, buried in the said church which had respect to the said place and canons; and that the same manor in the suits of the court and relief is bound to us for one knight's fee for the removal of each former from Bishemede, and in different services; for the salvation of the soul of our mother and of our souls; and to the souls of Roger de Rollinges, and our ancestors and successors, on behalf of us and our heirs, or any of our assigns and successors, we have remitted and quitted the aforesaid canonical reliefs and the aforesaid sects to the same prior and canons in perpetuity, &c. In whose, &c.

Calendar of the Patent Rolls Henry III 1232-1247 p398 (1906)
 1243. Oct. 18.
Westminster.
  Charter granting to Simon de Cryoyl and Maud his wife and their heirs free warren in all their demesne lands of Asherdeford, of a weekly market there on Saturdays, and a yearly fair for three days on the eve, day and morrow of the Decollation of St. John the Baptist. Witnesses:—The archbishop of York, R. bishop of Chichester, W. bishop of Carlisle, W. bishop of Worcester, William Lungespe, W. de Cantilupo, Geoffrey le Despenser, Robert de Mucegros, John de Plesseto, P. Peyvre, Nicholas de Bolevill, Richard de Clifford, Walter de Luton, Theobald de Englechevill and others.

Calendar of the Patent Rolls Henry III 1247-1258 p140 (1908)
 1252. May 21.
Merton.
  Exemption, for life, of Simon de Crioll from being made coroner or from being put on assizes, juries or recognitions.

In 1255, Simon de Crioll and John de Crioll, possibly his brother, are noted to be among a group of men attending to the custody of the king's castle at Dover.
Calendar of the Close Rolls Henry III 1254-1256 p181 (1931)
1255.
  Et quia Johannes de Crioll’, Simon de Crioll’, Thomas Abbelyn, Willelmus de Mareswurth’, Willelmus de Orlaveston’, senior, Johannes de Suanes, Henricus Malemeyns, Johannes Peverell’, Petrus de Burton’, Robertus Turneboel, magister Girardus, Clemens de Walwar’, Hugo de Lesseburn’, Thomas Mauntel et Egidius Balistarius sunt intendentes custodie castri regis Dovor’; habent eandem quietanciam ad presens.

Calendar of the Patent Rolls Henry III 1247-1258 pp645-6 (1908)
 1258. Aug. 4.
Westminster.
  Mandate to Alvred de Lincolnia, Ivo de Rocheford, John de Stroda and William de Kaynnesof the county of Dorset, in pursuance of an ordinance lately made in the parliament of Oxford [compare Fœdera quoted from the Annals of Burton] to enquire touching excesses, trespasses and injuries committed in that county, and to bring their inquisition personally to Westminster by the octaves of Michaelmas, for delivery to the council.      By C.
  Mandate in pursuance to the sheriff.       By the same.
  In the form of the said letters patent it is written to four knights of each county following, and in the form of the said letters close it is written to each sheriff in England;—       By C.
... Kent.
Simon de Kryollis
Fulk Peyforer
John de Sandwico
Geoffrey de Scolond

Villare Cantianum p55 (John Philipot, 1776)
  ASHFORD, in the hundred of Chart and Longbridge, was one of those manors which was marshalled under the jurisdiction and propriety of the eminent family of Crioll. Simon de Crioll, in the twenty seventh and twenty eighth year of Henry the third, obtained a charter of free warren to his manor of Ashford, and Mawde de Crioll, his widow, died seized of it in the fifty second year of Henry the third, and left it to her son William de Keriell, who, as William Glover, Somerset, herald out of an old court roll does attest, confirmed that change his mother had designed in her life time, and passed away this manor to Roger de Leybourne for Stocton in Huntington-shire, and Rumford in Essex
p281
  RIDLINGSWOULD
...  Oxney-house in this parish, was an ancient seat of the noble family of Criol. Matilda, widow of Simon de Criol, died possessed of it, in the fifty-second year of Henry the third, and transmitted it to Bertram de Criol, who held it at his death, which was in the twenty-third year of Edward the first, Rot. Esc. Num. After him his son Bertram de Criol was settled in the possession, but was not long lived after his father, for he died in the thirty-fourth year of Edward the first Rot. Esc. Num. 37, and left it to his brother John Criol, who dying without issue, it was brought to his sister Joan Criol, who by marrying with Sir Richard de Rokesley, made it the inheritance of that name and family, and was in possession of it at her death, which was in the fifteenth year of Edward the second, Rot. Esc. Num. 95.
p351
   WALMER is a member of Sandwich, and so is in no hundred: it was one of those principal seats which owned the jurisdiction and signory of the noble and spreading family of Crioll, written frequently likewise Keriel. The first, whom I find to be possessed of it, was Matilda de Crioll, widow of Simon de Crioll, and she in right of dower was in possession of it at her death, which was in the fifty-second of Henry the third, Rot. Esc. Num. 34. The next of this name whom the beams of public record represent to me to be the possessor of it, was Nicholas de Crioll, who enjoyed it at his death, which was in the thirty-first of Edward the first Rot. Esc. Num. 39.

The History of Walmer and Walmer Castle p43 (Charles Robert Stebbing Elvin, 1894)
Philipot asserts that Matilda de Criol, widow of Simon de Criol, died possessed of this manor, 52 Hen. III., A.D. 1278 [Vill. Cant. p. 351]: while Furley, in his Weald of Kent, mentions that a Simon de Crioll of Walmer was amongst the fifty “leading men of Kent” who accompanied King Edward I. in the Conquest of Scotland, and that he was knighted, A.D. 1300, for his services at the Siege of Caerlaveroch. The truth is that both these Simons belonged to another branch of the great family of Criol, who held not the manor of Walmer, but Cotmanton in Sholden, which then ranked as a manor, and is said to have extended into this parish. Simon de Criol, husband of Matilda, above mentioned, held Cotmanton of the Abbot of St. Augustine’s, by knight service, temp. Hen. III. 

The VCH  History of the County of Huntingdonshire confuses Simon and Nicholas de Crioll, incorrectly stating the latter to be the father of the sisters Nichola, Beatrice and Margery.
A History of the County of Huntingdon vol 2 pp354-369 (1932)
GREAT STAUGHTON
This last William left coheirs, possibly daughters, who were represented in 1265 by Nicholas de Crioll and William Heringaud or Herengod, perhaps husbands of the coheirs, who, after the Battle of Evesham, were thought to be rebels. They are later described as parceners of the inheritance of William de Eynesford. It would appear that Nicholas de Crioll married firstly Maud, probably the daughter of William de Eynesford, by whom he had three daughters, Nicholaa, Margery, and Beatrice, and secondly Joan, daughter and heir of William de Auberville of Eynesford (co. Kent), by whom he had a son Nicholas, a minor at the time of his father's death in 1273. Of the daughters, who inherited their mother's property, Nicholaa married Adam de Creting, Margery seems to have died unmarried, and Beatrice married Anselm de Gyse. Before the death of Maud, Nicholas's first wife, her moiety of the manor was conveyed to Roger de Leyburne. William Heringaud, who married the other coheir of William de Eynesford, succeeded his father Stephen in 1257 to the possessions in Kent. William died before 1273, leaving a daughter Emma, but in 1293 the heir of Stephen is said to have been Christine wife of William de Kirkeby, from which it would appear that Emma died unmarried, so that the interest in her mother's moiety would pass to her cousins, the Criolls. William Heringaud, however, had conveyed the interest of his wife's moiety of Staughton to Roger de Leyburne, who thus held the whole manor. About 1271 Roger de Leyburne and Eleanor de Vaux, Countess of Winchester, his wife, exchanged the manor of Staughton, which they had of the gift of Nicholas de Crioll and William Heringaud, with Roger de Rolling and Maud, daughter of William de Eshetesford (Ashford), his wife, for lands in Kent and Sussex. About this time the coheirs of Nicholas de Crioll claimed that the grant to Roger de Leyburne was void, as Nicholas held only by courtesy in right of his wife; consequently in 1274 the escheator was ordered to give seisin of a moiety of the manor of Staughton to Nicholaa, Margery and Beatrice. By 1279 Margery de Crioll and Emma Heringaud were probably dead, as Adam de Creting and Anselm de Gyse are said to have held the whole manor. The question whether Maud de Crioll (Kyriel) was seised in her demesne as of fee of the manor of Great Staughton, of which one moiety was held by Adam de Creting and Nicholaa, and the other by Anselm de Gyse and Beatrice, was brought before the justices of assize in 1286 and the case was adjourned to Westminster, Adam de Rolling being vouched to warrant. The Crioll title became established and in the same year Adam and Anselm were said to hold the manor with view of frankpledge and free warren. By a series of conveyances, the whole manor and the advowson became vested in Adam de Creting and Nicholaa his wife.

Death: about 1267

Probate:
Calendar of Inquisitions Post Mortem vol 1 Henry III 1235-1272 p214 (1904)
680. SIMON DE CRYEL and MAUD his wife.
Writ (missing).  Inq. (undated and defective).
   His 8 sons, aged respectively 30, 24, 23, 20, 15, 14, 12 and 11, succeed the said Simon equally in the following inheritance:—
[KENT.] [Esset]eford, Seveneton, Estesture, and Pakemanston, 2 knights’ fees, viz.—3 carucates land, with the advowson of Esseteford, held by the said Maud on the day when the said Simon died, of the king in chief by rendering 20s. yearly for the guard of Dover castle.
  Moningeham. 240a. of gavelkind land held by the said Simon of the prior of Holy Trinity . . . . . . and many husbandmen of that neighbourhood, service unspecified.
  Twytham. 60a. held of the archbishop and of the said prior, service unspecified.
  Swatford. 60a. of rough land (dura terra) held of the abbot, &c. of [St. A]ugustine, service unspecified.
  Sadhokesherst. 60a. of the roughest (durssima) land held of William and Henry de Sadhokesherst, rendering 2 marks.
  And the said Maud shall hold a moiety of the above through her marriage so long as she shall be a widow.  (See Rot. Fin. 52 Hen. III. m. 1.)
          C. Hen. III. File. 35. (14.)

Archaeologia Cantiana vol 5 1863 pp297-8 (1863)
    INQUISITIONES POST MORTEM.
      XLIII.
    [Esc. No. 34 52 Hen. III., 1267.]
Inquisition of the lands of SIMON DE CRYEL, and MATILDA, his wife, on the death of SIMON.
  [This is] the Inquisition made of the lands and tenements of SIMON DE CRYEL, and MATILDA, his wife, on the day of the said
SIMON's death, by,—
  Walter le Fulur,—John de Repeton,—Galfridus ate Brok,—Humfrey . . . . . . . . . . le Grare,—Stephen Cusin,—Daniel Sprt,—John de Wynelesbergh,—Nicholas ate Brok,—Thomas Ponnont,—Galfridus de Swatford,—Matthew Fabr . . . . . . . ate Bremth, and Walter Fitz Hamon.
  Who say on their oath, that the said MATILDA held of our lord the King in capita on the day of the said SIMON's death two knights’-fees in [ESSE]TEFORD, SEVENETON, and USTESTURE and PAKEMANSTON, to wit, 3 carucates of land with their appurtenances, which are worth per annum £20, with the advowson of the church of ESSETEFORD, which [is worth] per annum 30 marks, by payment annually of 20s. to the Ward of the Castle of Dovor. And they say that the said Simon held nothing of our lord the King in capite, but held [at] MONINGEHAM 240 acres in Gavelykende, which are worth, per annum, 40 marks in all issues, and held these of the Prior of the Holy Trinity . . . . . . [et plur’ Husebund’ de illo insueto . . . .] And he also held at TWYCHAM of the lord Archbishop and the said Prior 60 acres, worth per annum, in all issues, 10 marks. And he held at SWATFORD 60 acres of stubborn land, worth per annum, in entire income, 20s., and he held these of the Abbot of St. Augustine. And he held at SADHOKESHERST of WILLIAM and HENRY DE SADOKESHERST 60 acres of most stubborn land, by paying thence to the said HENRY and WILLIAM 2 marks; and they are worth per annum, in all issues, 5s. And he has eight sons, who all equally succeed him in the aforesaid inheritance, and his eldest son is of 30 years, and the 2nd of 24, and the 3rd of 23, and the 4th of 20 years, and the 5th of 15 years, and the 6th of 14 years, and the 7th of 12 years, and the 8th of 11 years. And the said MATILDA was holding in right of marriage a moiety of all the aforesaid land so long as she was a widow. In witness of which thing, all the aforesaid inquisitors have to this inquisition affixed their seals.

Sources:
Return to Chris Gosnell's Home Page

If you have any comments, additions or modifications to the information on this page, please feel free to email me.
Created and maintained by: chris@ocotilloroad.com