Death: 16 January 1982, Abingdon,
Berkshire, England
Will: dated 28 September 1962
Census & Addresses:
1901: Abingdon district, Berkshire: Margaret Fairthorn is aged 1, born
in Faringdon, Berkshire
1911: Abingdon district, Berkshire: Margaret Vere Fairthorne is aged 11
Married: Evelyn Haines Jones on 19
January 1936 in Dartford
district, Kent, England.
Evelyn was born on 19 December 1887 in Blackheath, London, and died on
3 March 1962. He was a motor engineer.
Census:
1901: Orpington district, Kent: Evelyn Haynes Jones is aged 15, born in
Blackheath, London
1911: Bromley district, Kent: Evelyn Haines Jones is aged 25
London
Gazette 20 August 1918 p9728 NOTICE is hereby
given, that the Partnership heretofore subsisting between us, the
undersigned, Percy Edward Soans, Charles Herbert Soans, Evelyn Haines
Jones and Edward Dunn, carrying on business as Motor Engineers, at 40,
Napier-road, Bromley, Kent, and 93, Masons-hill, Bromley aforesaid,
under tihe style or firm of SOANS, DUNN AND JONES, has been dissolved
by mutual consent as and from the tihird day of September, 1917, so far
as concerns the said Evelyn Haines Jones, who retires from the said
business. All debts due to and owing by the said late firm will be
received and paid by the above named Percy Edward Soans, Charles
Herbert Soans and Edward Dunn, who will continue the said business. -
Dated the 9th day of August, 1918.
E. HAINES JONES
(by W. Jones,
his Attorney).
P. E. SOANS.
C. H. SOANS.
E. DUNN.
Death: 22 June 1987
Census & Addresses:
1911: Abingdon district, Berkshire: Norah Fairthorne is aged 8
Married: Helen Dunbar Hamilton Jacob in
1929, in Hendon
district, Middlesex, England. Helen was born on 16 April 1907, in Kensington
district, London. She died in April 1996.
Occupation: Naval Officer; Civil
Servant; Consulting Engineer
In 1911 at just 12 years of age, Richard entered the Royal Naval
College at Osborne on the Isle of Wight. Two years later he moved at
Dartmouth but did not complete the course since the war broke out. He
started his career aboard the Leviathan and joined the
battleship Warspite a week before the Battle
of Jutland
in 1916. H.M.S. Warspite pp33-4 by Iain Ballantyne
(2001): Midshipman Richard Fairthorne joined Warspite
on the day of her arrival at Rosyth, finding the battleship at anchor
on the Forth an inspiring sight, which sent his spirits soaring. He had
just come from the dull routine of serving aboard the ancient cruiser Leviathan
on the boring West Indies Station. Midshipman Fairthorne was delighted
there was no prospect of the 'indescribable tedium' of coaling.
Nearly sixty years later Fairthorne wrote that, on boarding the Warspite '...one sensed at once
that she was a happy and efficient unit.' The Warspite
was an immaculate vessel, all spick and span, with the brass polished
to blinding perfection, the paintwork pristine and wooden decks
unblemished.
and when the squadron sailed on it way to the Battle p35: Aboard the Warspite
there was no feeling among the crew of going to meet a date with
destiny, rather one of dull routine. Midshipman Fairthorne - new to all
this and therefore excited - was amazed at how calmly the crew of Warspite
went about their business.
His new shipmates explained they found it hard to believe this
would be anything other than another wild goose chase.
and after the Battle, pp57-8
The Germans were, however, claiming to have sunk the Warspite.
While the 150 holes in her bore testimony to the ferocity and accuracy
of the German gunnery, she had obviously lived to fight another day.
According to Captain Donald Macintyre, in Jutland, the
battlecruiser Invincible's
death, was mistaken for Warspite's
destruction.
In reality Warspite's
casualties and damage were minimal and good evidence of her solid
construction. But, like many others fretting in the vacuum created by
the British failure to swiftly release a detailed account of the
battle, the family of Warspite's
Midshipman Fairthorne feared for the worst. They didn't want to believe
their son's ship was gone, but they had no information to contradict
German claims.
Midshipman Fairthorne recalled: At home my
family,
on opening the morning newspaper of 3 June, had been confronted with
several versions of the encounter, one of which was the German claim to
have sunk the new battleship Warspite.
Luckily I had the foresight to send a telegram of reassurance when the
Marine postman went ashore, so they were kept in suspense only till
that afternoon.
Lieutenant Richard B.
Fairthorne was placed on the Admiralty retired list at his own request,
under the Geddes Axe, on 10 November 1922 (London Gazette 21 November 1922 p8213)
and made Lieutenant-Commander (Retd.) on 14 September 1927 (London Gazette 23 September 1927 p6058).
After retirement from the navy, Richard trained as a mechanical and
electrical engineer, and published a paper in the Structural Engineer vol 7 issue 9 (1929)
on Asphalt
as
a Vibration Absorbent.
Richard's consulting engineering partnership with William Pollard Digby
, located at 6 Queen Anne's Gate, London, was dissolved in 1933. London
Gazette 15 December 1933 p8165 NOTICE
is
hereby given that the Partnership heretofore subsisting between us,
the undersigned, William Pollard Digby, of 6, Queen Annes Gate, in the
county of London, Consulting Engineer, and Richard Berkley Fairthorne.
of 6,
Queen Annes Gate aforesaid, Consulting Engineer, carrying on business
as Consulting Engineers, at 6, Queen Annes Gate aforesaid, under the
style or firm of DIGBY & FAIRTHORNE, has been dissolved by mutual
consent as from the thirtieth day of November, 1933. All debts due and
owing to or by the late firm will be respectively received and paid by
the said William Pollard Digby. The said business will be carried on in
the future by the said William Pollard Digby, under the style or firm
of "W. P. Digby and Partners." - As witness our hands this 7th day of
December, 1933.
WILLIAM POLLARD DIGBY.
RICHARD BERKLEY FAIRTHORNE.
Richard was recalled to active service in 1939, with the rank of
Lieutenant Commander. He wrote this article in the Naval Review, April 1982, pp101-107.
Some
Thoughts on the Navy over Sixty-five
Years
(These
reminiscences were written by Lieut. Commander R. B. Fairthorne, Master
Mariner - Editor.)
HAVING joined the
Royal Navy as a cadet as long ago as 1911, I suppose one still cannot
quite claim to have belonged to the era of the wooden ships and the
iron men. Nevertheless, part of our seamanship training was on board
the sailing three-decker Britannia,
moored permanently in
the river Dart near the College. Ominously a raised net was spread
below the rigging so as to break the fall of any unfortunate cadet who
missed his footing - a grim reminder of days when this refinement was
lacking. Older shipmates remembered punishments really fitting the
crime, such as a sailor caught spitting being compelled to wear a
spitkid slung from his neck until such time as he found another
offender, to whom he then transferred the receptacle. Another example
was the man charged with drunkenness, whereupon he complained that
someone had added alcohol to the fresh water tank. In commiserating
with him the Executive Officer ordered the ship's police to arm him for
sentry duty during leisure hours to prevent such a lamentable
recurrence. Tradition dies hard
The Navy is inherently conservative and tradition dies hard. When I
retired under the Geddes axe of 1923, the Boatswain's stores still
included a cat-o-nine-tails, although no longer used. Likewise the
paying-off pennant has persisted; it once meant literally paying off,
as no payment was made to anyone until the end of the ship's
commission. When eventually payment was made at regular intervals, the
pennant continued to be flown from the masthead to mark the end of the
commission, its length being that of the ship, plus an extra length for
each additional month over two years. Traditionally it represented the
combined length of all the cleaning rags stitched together. This narrow
pennant terminates in a pigs bladder to keep the end afloat, and is a
picturesque sight - but can be a nuisance if entangled with nearby
shipping.
Another example of lasting tradition is in the drinking of the
royal toast. After bumping his head on an overhead beam, King William
IV is said to have decreed that henceforward the toast could be drunk
seated both ashore and afloat. This concession, although exercised to
this day, seems however unnecessary in the painted hall at Greenwich
where headroom is hardly so limited! One custom sometimes suspended in
submarine-infested areas was that of ringing sixteen bells, instead of
eight, by the youngest officer at the New Year. The ceremony of
crossing the line, and the Saturday-night-at-sea toast of 'Sweethearts
and wives' were both honoured in my day, even in wartime, and doubtless
persist.
Contrariwise, the Navy is not slow to adopt technical
improvements, as witness the epoch-making HMS Dreadnought
(1906) which rendered obsolete overnight all other capital ships afloat
and under construction. Nor can it be thought lacking in resource with
the example of the composite destroyer Zubian,
blend of the sister ships Zulu
(Hawthorn built) and Nubian
(Thorneycroft built) after one had lost her stern and the other her bow
(dubbed 'Hawthornycroft'), reducing the loss of two ships to one.
Except in procedure, I doubt whether courts-martial have altered much.
The navigator on trial for having 'negligently or by default hazarded
H.M. vessel' still occasionally pleads that the black buoy had become
reddish due to rusting, forgetting (which the court does not) that
buoys have distinctive shapes as well as colours. Submariners will
remember making the difficult dash across Portsmouth harbour, aiming to
berth alongside Fort Blockhouse, but finding their craft swept on to
the mudbank opposite instead. Somehow this offence escaped the heading
and hazarding the grounding - is the Haslar approach still known as
'reasons in writing creek?'. One somewhat unnecessary charge has
disappeared; during the first war all surviving officers and men were
automatically court-martialled and it behoved them to prove that in
abandoning their ship they had acted in accordance with the best
service traditions; a bit hard perhaps on the six survivors who,
suffering from shock and immersion, were the only ones left alive of
1275 after the instantaneous explosion which rent HMS Queen
Mary
for example at Jutland (1916). One of the most serious wartime offences
is sleeping on one's watch. A certain submarine at the Dardanelles (1
91 5) had only one wireless operator allowed by complement. To meet
such limited conditions the operational signals concerning enemy
movement etc. were broadcast at certain times only. During one such
period the submarine Captain found his operator slumped across the tiny
wireless cabinet, an easy lapse in the stale air. Brought on deck under
guard, he was informed that the sole factor saving him from being
summarily shot was that there was no other operator.
For better or worse, the rum ration, never available to
commissioned officers, has disappeared - but only recently. I have
known a watch-keeping lookout do an extra four hours watch in a North
Sea blizzard in exchange for another's tot, consisting of half a gill
before compulsory watering down in the case of junior ratings.
Eccentricity is not confined to senior officers, or a particular era. A
contemporary, on reporting to his youngish Commanding Officer was asked
to go below and write out his resignation. In vain did my friend
protest that he had barely joined, only to be told that it was required
but left undated, in case of future need. There must be many who on
arrival in Malta have been proudly invited by bumboatmen to inspect
their testimonials containing the double
entendre
such as '. . . excellent custodian of other people's property', and
concluding '. . . can therefore confidently recommend the bearer for a
berth - the wider the better'. A Flag Lieutenant, R.M.
Fallacies abound in the layman's concept of naval life, e.g.
seamen do not inhabit the lower deck, their quarters being two decks
higher on the main deck, above the waterline; an Admiral does not
command a ship (exception, the Royal Yacht) but a squadron. Equally
vague is the frequent question as to the function of the Royal Marines.
It is not really a matter of what they do, but is there any duty they
cannot perform? Located between the officers' quarters and the rest of
the ship's company, the marines, traditionally loyal, occupy this
missing space. They constitute about one fifth of the complement and
form their own guns' crews in friendly competition with the seamen.
With their badge, the globe and laurel, they are first in a landing
party and by reputation they can outsmart the guards. One admiral who
regarded Marines highly, decided not so long ago to nominate one as his
flag lieutenant, but was told there was no precedent. Yet nothing could
be found in the regulations confining this appointment to a naval
officer, and it duly went through. Most people think they know the
regulations, then comes the awful moment when they find the reverse!
A friend was riding his motorcycle in uniform along the narrow
sea wall near Fort Blockhouse when he saw approaching him the Flag
Officer Submarines. There was no escape down a side street, and
panicking on being unable to remember the appropriate salute, he
stopped short and jacked up his machine, standing at the salute.
Unfortunately the Admiral himself was a keen motorcyclist and
tongue-in-cheek put the most searching questions to my friend as to why
the machine had failed.
Naval regulations and rules are both numerous and complicated,
rendered more so by their antiquity, frequent ambiguity, comprehensive
scope and exacting nature - an amalgam indeed. Basic guidelines for
behaviour include the Kings Regulations & Admiralty Instructions,
the Naval Discipline Act, the Articles of War (read once a quarter
before the assembled ships' company in wartime). Periodic instructions
were promulgated in Admiralty Fleet Orders and local port orders, but
these do not exhaust the list. Chart corrections seemed to come in too
frequently for officers doing navigation and pilotage as an extra duty
in ships too small to carry a specialist.
Some KR and AI were disregarded, for instance the Commanding
Officer is required to visit the engine room once every twenty-four
hours. By so doing he would have astonished the department and
seriously embarrassed the Engineer Officer. One thing is certain
concerning the regulations - they invite and receive much ingenuity. On
finding it laid down that the crew must be exercised by night at action
stations once a quarter, one astute captain ordered this to take place
at 23.50 on New Year's Eve when everyone was still awake due to the
festivities, and the evolution to be completed at 00.10, thus reducing
the requirement for four per year to two. Once I experienced firsthand
a wartime wangle which, although amusing, could have had dire
consequences if detected. When the Captain's wife, a Malta-based VAD,
expressed a wish to go to sea in the ship, she was told it was out of
the question. Undeterred, she insisted, and a way out was duly found
(it had to be). After refit we did a short trip on the measured mile to
satisfy the dockyard.
The lady was smuggled below deck, and when clear of the
harbour she emerged clad in oilskins and souwester, surveying the scene
from the upper bridge. I have sometimes wondered what would have
resulted if a signalman at the Castille had chanced to level his
telescope on the group clad in oilskins, for the weather was perfect!
And now for a personal confession - adorning my home is a fine brass
gong formed from an inverted shell case originally logged as 'lost
overboard by accident during heavy weather'.
When a man during inspection steps forward with the seemingly
Lilliputian request 'Permission to grow, Sir', he is merely asking to
be allowed to grow a beard. (If this permission were not required, he
would only need to plead, when unshaven, being in the process of
growing one). In the Sailors' Guide of 1843, taking fourth place under
'Miscellaneous', I find rather surprisingly '. . . .the sailor may
change his religious denomination with the consent of the Captain'.
Equally strange is the continuing requirement of pure European descent,
whatever that meant, for the cadet entrant.
There seems little basis for the popular idea of seasickness -
on the first day out being afraid you are going to die, the next day
that you are not. Seasick-prone, I have never found the victim who did
not recover, and quickly. Yet there is the testimony of Nelson himself
that here was an exception. The captain of my first seagoing ship (born
1867), a not unkindly man, was wont to declare that there is only one
cure, the doubtful recipe of plenty of hard work. Defect list strategy
If there was a job for the dockyard one had to be careful that
it was described in the defect list in acceptable form - a repair
rather than an addition or alteration. A captain of mine was constantly
disturbed by traffic along a small but important passageway outside his
cabin. Sending for the Engineer Officer as the time for refit
approached, he told him to enter in the list '. . . to install
partition. . .'. The Chief advised him that this would be turned down
flat, and first to let him get the shipwright to rig up a makeshift
consisting of something, if
only millboard, and to rephrase the application '. . . to repair
existing bulkhead and render seaworthy . . .', whereupon there were no
problems.
Gunroom initiation of midshipmen going afloat was only the
beginning of their troubles. By 1914 they were tending to ease, but
every newcomer was initiated, i.e. 'christened' by the breaking of a
soup plate over his head. A colleague of mine considered himself lucky
- the plate was already cracked. If there was one law for a section of
the community and another for the rest, it was surely in the rights of
the lower deck compared with those of subordinate officers, though
hardly in the direction suggested by the old saw. The lowest rating
could lodge a formal complaint and insist that it received attention,
if necessary up to appeal. By contrast, woe betide the midshipman who
tried to air his rights, assuming that he had any (did any midshipman
dare even to enquire?). Before long he was reminded that a midshipman
has been defined as the convenient medium of abuse between two officers
of unequal seniority. Leaving the Forth on a pitch dark evening, the
Captain bade me 'Tell the wireless officer to make a coded signal to Inflexible,
which is entering harbour on an almost opposite course, that we are
timed to pass Inch Keith at midnight.' On reporting this to the W/T
officer he said 'I don't accept signals verbally.' Quite correct, but
how to act! Had I returned to the bridge as the bearer of this remark,
even soft-pedalled, the balloon would have gone up, but the eventual
sufferer would have been myself. Rustling up a signal pad, disappearing
behind the cabinet, and cunningly allowing a suitable interval to make
the W/T officer think I had gone to the bridge and back, I scrawled the
message and some initials which proved sufficient. My two and a half
years as a midshipman taught me the double attitude towards the
subordinate rank. As an extreme case, one could take charge of a picket
boat landing troops under fire in the afternoon (and later be awarded
the DSC), and that same evening receive childish chastisement at the
hands of one's gunroom seniors; all this and a good deal more for one
shilling per day if I remember rightly.
There was an optical illusion which never failed to fascinate.
On approaching the Forth Bridge it seemed right up to the last moment
that the topmast must foul the underside. Hardened seafarers would dive
below decks, and some behave so irrationally as to duck or even turn up
their coatcollars. Then almost as the impact seemed imminent, the mast
appeared to take a dive. Looking back, one again wonders how it
cleared. At high water spring tides our actual clearance at midspan was
some twelve feet. Pitfalls abound
The Service is riddled with procedure pitfalls, but some could
be foreseen from a common-sense viewpoint, such as the formal approval
for the officer to proceed on short leave. This must be done whilst
still in uniform it being considered presumptuous otherwise. Similarly,
junior officers descend the gangway into the boat first, thereby not
keeping seniors waiting. There is the story of Winston Churchill around
1911 finding his way unobserved into a naval dockyard at dead of night,
giving a battleship's quartermaster the slip, and after ringing a
wardroom bell, demanding how the First Lord could get so far
unchallenged! The enormity of this gaffe can only be appreciated when
it is realised that the wardroom is sacrosanct to its inmates; even the
most autocratic Captain removes his cap on the rare occasions of
entering. A more clumsily ignorant layman's choice it would be
difficult to conceive. There is, I suppose, nothing strange in the fact
that the one unbroken rule is unwritten - never to instruct or even ask
another to undertake something dangerous or unpleasant which one is not
fully prepared to do oneself. Is there a link with the Christian ethic
here?
Ships were manned from either Portsmouth, Chatham or Devonport
depots, but commissioned officers may serve anywhere and this gives
them an opportunity of seeing the characteristics of each. Personally,
give me a Chatham (Nore Command) crew with its cockney element. There
is no seven-and-a-half-hour day afloat, and after emergency
cancellation of leave, a dismal affair, the second-in-command gets the
bugler to sound off 'Clear lower deck, everybody aft', steps up on to
the roof of the aft turret, and tells them in plain language why it has
been necessary, what is required of the ship and her company, and they
get to work with a will. This is not to say that the other two depots
are lacking in fine qualities also. The Matelot
A word about the characteristics of the matelot of yesteryear. He was
not overburdened with knowledge and a trifle naive. For example, when
volunteers were called for Scott's expedition, some applied thinking
that because the Arctic was cold the Antarctic must be warm. He could
be clumsy to a degree - remember Murphy's Law - if someone can try to
connect up two half components the wrong way round, and bust one or
both in the process, he will do just that. Hence equipment for the
Services is robust in the extreme. One of the more tiresome maladies
which can afflict him is 'last-ship-itis'; the previous commission in
retrospect is always a paradise. True, the rollicking Jack Tar may have
had the occasional urge to despatch the ship's police to the bottom of
the nearest dry dock on a dark night, but on the whole he was not
lacking in generosity. When a messmate died, his kit was auctioned and
as the proceeds went to the dependants, high prices resulted. Not so,
however, when a deserter's kit was similarly auctioned, for the State
benefited. He was kind to animals to the point of overfeeding them, was
the soul of honesty and could leave his pay on top of his ditty box in
the certain knowledge that it would remain intact - can the same be
said today? He was also quick-witted, for when I was serving on a
battleship involved in night collision with another, after firing
exercise in Scapa Flow, a voice alongside me, before the tremor had
subsided, piped up 'There's a week's leave'. To say that his gags never
became outworn, especially if topical, would be to put it mildly; 'If
from Plymouth Hoe you can see the Eddystone, it's going to rain, if you
can't it's raining already'.
He had a profound contempt for politicians, written down as a
crafty breed, as likely as not to couple a pay award on the one hand
with a reduction in allowances on the other. When it came to a
complaint, he had to be careful to make it individually, as any
suggestion of joint action could be construed as mutinous. It is safe
to say that
drunkenness has declined. It was the unenviable task of the
Officer-of-the-watch, unaided by the medical officer (unless drugs were
involved) to decide, then and there, whether a rating was drunk or
sober. No grading was permissible, the only criterion being whether he
was capable of performing his duties; but how could the
Officer-of-the-watch be sure, if no practical test, such as walking a
deck seam, was allowed? I have seen two libertymen ascending the
gangway, each with difficulty, holding the other up, successfully brace
themselves for separate inspection on the quarterdeck, then go forward
to create a disturbance on the mess decks. The unfortunate
Officer-of-the-watch, having given them the benefit of doubt, was then
himself for it.
One of the worst things which can befall the Service, casting
gloom overall, is to let down unwittingly one of the other services,
the example immediately springing to mind being the loss of Lord
Kitchener when HMS Hampshire
was mined in heavy weather off Orkney in 1916. Fortunately such events
can be offset by instances of the Navy coming to the timely help of her
two sister services.
The sea has a magnifying effect on the individual. If, for
example, he is mean ashore, he becomes twice as mean afloat. If he is
brave on land he becomes braver at sea. It has other strange effects; a
contemporary of mine, although due for the luxury of a night-in (no
night duty watch) used to put down for the sentry to shake him up at
03.45, for the pleasure of resuming sleep. The type who is legendary
throughout the Service is not your VC, but more likely someone renowned
for his capacity to sink a dozen pints before breakfast, or who ran
three ships ashore in succession. There is a common lay belief that
your VC is invariably a dashing extrovert. Having served with five
(not, I may say, during their exploits) I found that this is far from
reality; all have been retiring, modest and if anything introvert. One
peculiarity about the naval officer of my generation - he was an
extraordinary mixture of extreme caution, coupled with utter
recklessness, the former born of pilotage risks, e.g. commanding a ship
entering port, particularly a foreign one, he would go in stern first
so as to obtain more power and steerage way if a speedy departure
became necessary.
The exchange of signals has always played an important part in
naval life. When the flag-captain of Lord Charles Beresford, Sir John
Fisher's second-in-command, had made a mess of mooring the second
flagship in Malta, thereby delaying the rest of the squadron which was
unhappily entering in reverse order, the C-in-C signalled in full view
of the fleet, 'You are to proceed to sea again and reenter Valetta in a
seamanlike manner.' Many believe that this episode sparked off the long
and unedifying feud between the two Admirals. Similar dynamite resulted
from the undoubtedly insubordinate signal from Sir Percy Scott, gunnery
enthusiast, to a ship of his squadron, to the effect that paintwork
being more important than gunnery, she was to break off exercises and
as ordained by the C-in-C make herself look pretty for a forthcoming
inspection.
This gave rise to a signal by the C-in-C (Lord Charles
Beresford) ordering that the offending signal be 'expunged from the
log' - of doubtful feasibility anyway; it merely perpetuated both
signals.
The flagship in which I served abroad had a habit of spending
too long in harbour while the rest of the squadron did more than their
share of wartime patrolling. After a particularly long spell, the
flagship put to sea to the accompaniment of jeers from the adjoining
cruiser. When our admiral signalled 'Indicate the cause of the
disturbance on your upper deck', everyone wondered what possible reply
there could be, but not for long! Back came the immediate signal
'Submit the cause was a fight between ship's pets.' In lighter vein,
signals can go down to posterity. At Scapa Flow was a floating theatre
which used to come alongside the battleships in turn if they wanted to
put on a show. After one such entertainment, in which a 'cobra' rose
from its box, worked by invisible wires, a flag officer visitor
signalled next morning 'What a marvellous show! Please say how the
snake act was done.' Our reply, 'There
was no snake' took some living down.
In my day it was only necessary for a Post-Captain to serve some
twelve years without blotting his copy book and putting in the
qualifying sea-time, to attain flag rank automatically on heading the
seniority list. If not given a Rear-Admiral's appointment he then flew
his flag in HMS President on
Blackfriars Embankment for one day before retiring. The ten most senior
captains automatically became ADCs to the sovereign. The courtesy title
of Captain for Commander seems to have died out, while that of
Commander for Lieutenant Commander has emerged and automatic promotion,
which in some cases extended to the retired list, seems to have
disappeared altogether. Technical change
The chief changes during my first spell (1911-23) were the replacement
of coal by oil fuel, the advent of the gyro compass which pointed to
the true north uninfluenced by the magnetism of the earth and the ship
itself, and lastly the conferring of military rank on the non-executive
branches.
Later there was an innovation so obvious that it seems amazing
not to have been thought of before. Hitherto the procedure was to send
half the ships' company from each ship on leave at Christmas and the
other half for the New Year, thereby incapacitating all the ships
because at a pinch a warship can be steamed on sixty per cent
complement, but not on half. The brainwave consisted of sending on
leave forty per cent of all ships' company together with sixty per cent
of another ships' company at Christmas. At the New Year the reverse
took place, thereby maintaining half of the fleet operational
throughout. Less bright was the review-time notion of assembling a
contingent from each ship aboard the Fleet Flagship in order to save
the King visiting each in turn. What the Executive Officer had not
foreseen was that the large assembly on the far side of the upper deck
would cause a slight list, but enough to raise the gangway platform
well clear of the water, thus causing the royal party needless
dexterity in clambering aboard. More recent changes
On recall in 1939 I found a welcome change in attitude towards
the RNR and RNVR. The old saying that the former were sailors but not
gentlemen, and the latter gentlemen but not sailors, had gone out.
Another improvement was the tendency to encourage juniors to submit
practical suggestions. For example, a simple effective way of warding
off frogmen carrying limpet mines is attributed to a young engineer. He
merely prescribed keeping the propellers just turning in the astern
direction when at anchor, thus drawing sufficient water past the ship
to thwart their operations which rely on still water. On the other
hand, expert debaters could still find room for criticism of the
wardroom or messdeck argument which invariably follows three stages -
flat assertion, equally flat denial, followed by abuse of a highly
personal nature.
The use of the christian name after only brief acquaintance,
unduly familiar to older hearers, seems to have sprung up after World
War 11. Previously one addressed messmates either by surname or when
off duty by nickname, if any. In 1951 I heard a senior officer
lecturer, after 'Any questions?', addressed unbelievably as 'George'.
Carried but one stage further in the path of current degeneracy, shall
we have to endure 'Aye Aye, Jeremy'?
An apt definition of the Senior Service is 'The finest
bachelors' club in the world'; but another thought is 'Never to have
served afloat in the RN, is only to have half lived.' It is necessary
to include afloat, because in
this bureaucratic and technological age it has been recently said of
the naval trend, with more than an element of truth, that a situation
is approaching when the Admiralty (now MOD Navy) is becoming a hundred
per cent efficient, but there will
be no corresponding ships!
Death: 13 December 1991, at Rock House,
Austenwood Lane, Chalfont St Peter, Buckinghamshire, England
Probate: granted 14 August 1992, at
Oxford, Oxfordshire, England
Census & Addresses:
1901: Abingdon district, Berkshire: Rich B. Fairthorn is aged 2, born
in Faringdon, Berkshire
1991: Flat 6, Graham House, Criss Grove, Chalfont St Peter,
Buckinghamshire (London Gazette 21 October 1992 p17696)
Education: Bradfield College,
Berkshire, and the University of London where he obtained a B.Sc. in
mathematics.
Robert attended Bradfield College from September 1918 until December
1921, and was a member of the Shooting VIII in 1920-21.
Married: Doris Mona Whiteside Hirst on
9 December 1933 in St Cyprian Church, Hayhill, Birmingham,
Warwickshire, England. The marriage was witnessed by G. H. Hirst and E.
R. Alexander.
Doris was born on 13 October 1903, and baptised on 22 November 1903 on
the Isle of Man, the daughter of George William Hirst and Mary Ann
Higgins. Doris was also a mathematician. She graduated from Birmingham
University with a B.A. in 1924. She obtained her M.A. in 1925 and was
on the staff of the Queen's University, Belfast from 1926 until 1930.
In 1928 she published a paper entitled "Supplementary
note on the parallel-plate condenser in two dimensions". She died
about 1988.
Census:
1911: Aston district, Warwickshire: Doris Mona W. Hirst is aged 7 Occupation: Mathematician and
pioneer in the field of information science.
In 1927 Robert joined the scientific staff of the Royal Aircraft
Establishment (RAE), in Farnborough, Hampshire, working on studies of
the stability of structures and the application of statistics to
aeronautical research. In 1945 he launched what became the Mathematical
Services Department of RAE, starting with commercial punched-card
equipment and techniques for scientific computing.
In 1963, Robert resigned from RAE to spent more time in information
science. He joined the staff of Herner and Company as senior scientist
and hled this post until 1967. He later served as visiting research
professor at Western Reserve University, and at State University of New
York at Albany.
Publications: Mechanical instruments for solving linear
simultaneous equations (Robert A. Fairthorne, 1944) Matching of operational languages in
documentary systems (Robert Arthur Fairthorne, 1956) Towards
Information Retrieval (Robert
Arthur Fairthorne, 1961) Unification of theory and empiricism in
information retrieval (Robert Arthur Fairthorne, Herner and
Company, 1967) Essays presented to Robert A. Fairthorne on the
occasion of his seventieth birthday (Robert A. Fairthorne,
Percy B. Walker, Aslib, 1974)
Notes: In 1907 Robert had a mastoid, a severe complication of a middle
ear infecton. His life was saved because their next door neighbour was
the editor of the Oxford Times and
therefore was one of very few to have a telephone. The doctor was
called and he was operated on on the kitchen table.
Image from the film X+X=0
by Robert Fairthorne and Brian Salt
(1936)
Robert was one of the earliest members of the British Film Institute
and in 1936, he made a critically acclaimed animated mathematical film
"Equation X+X=0" with Brian Salt. extract from the
'Crystals and Curves' programme in the Avanto Festival in Helsinki in
2005
Robert Fairthorne, Brian Salt: Equation X+X=0
(35mm, 1936, 5′, b/w, silent)
Animations of lines in motion were seen as an useful way to visualize
mathematical concepts or mathematical proofs. Most mathematical films
have been made as an aid for teachers, and this film is no exception.
Robert Fairthorne was a mathematician with an immense interest in
avant-garde film, and he saw aesthetic potential in the educational
animations Brian Salt was making. ‘If abstract films are really
abstract films...they deal exclusively with those abstract relations
that can be expressed in terms of shape and motion’, wrote Robert
Fairthorne in 1936.
Death: 24 May 2000
Obituary: Bulletin
of the American Society for Information
Science vol 27 no1 October/November 2000 In Appreciation
Robert Arthur Fairthorne, a true pioneer of information science, died
on May 24. He was a colleague, mentor and, above all, friend to many of
us. I want to present here an expression of appreciation of this giant
of our field, both of the scientist and of the personal friend. I do
not intend a complete biography, nor bibliography, just warm memories.
After obtaining a degree in mathematics from the University of London,
Robert Fairthorne spent the next 30 years on the scientific staff of
the Royal Aircraft Establishment (RAE), working on studies of the
stability of structures and the application of statistics to
aeronautical research. In 1945 he launched what became the Mathematical
Services Department of RAE, starting with commercial punchedcard
equipment and techniques for scientific computing.
Fairthorne said that his transition from computation to information
tasks occurred after attending a 1950 International Congress of
Mathematicians at Harvard University, at which time he also saw some
pioneering computer projects. He also visited with Calvin Mooers
and
studied his superimposed coding scheme. Mooers had presented a paper in
the Congress entitled "Information Retrieval Viewed as Temporal
Signaling," which was the first appearance of Mooers' phrase information
retrieval. With his
keen respect for language, Fairthorne took up this phrase and used it
in his writings, as witness his seminal book, Toward
Information Retrieval,
published in 1961.
During this early period of his involvement in our field, Fairthorne
wrote his paper "The Patterns of Retrieval," which appeared in American
Documentation, April 1956.
There he offered the expressions marking
and parking
to describe the activities in information work of identifying objects
for retrieval (marking) and placing them in some order (parking). Those
expressions would prove useful to others of us in the field.
It was not until he resigned from RAE in 1963 that Fairthorne became
even more active in information science circles, particularly in this
country. He came here earlier in the '60s to attend conferences and
speak at meetings. I met him at about this time. We who attended those
meetings at which he spoke soon recognized that it behooved us to
listen carefully, because he had important, perceptive messages for us.
Fairthorne had also met Saul Herner at this time. Saul invited
Fairthorne to join the staff of Herner and Company as senior scientist,
a position in which he served from 1963 to 1967. This appointment put
Fairthorne in close contact with another colleague and friend, Harold
Wooster, who was director of information science in the Air Force
Office of Scientific Research (AFOSR). Under a contract with the AFOSR
Fairthorne carried on various projects with fundamental contributions
to information science. A major accomplishment, for example, was his
analysis of the meaning and limitations of Bradford's Law of
Scattering, relating it to Zipf's Law and Mandelbrot's work. Fairthorne
thus helped to rationalize and explain the derivations and, again,
limitations of the newly emerging field of bibliometrics. His paper,
"Empirical Hyperbolic Distributions (Bradford, Zipf, Mandelbrot) for
Bibliometric Distribution and Prediction," became a classic in our
field. But Fairthorne liked to refer to it as "Zipf Unfastened."
Fairthorne also served as visiting research professor at Western
Reserve University, at the invitation of Dean Jesse Shera, and at State
University of New York at Albany, at the request of Professor Lea
Bohnert. And he received the ASIS Award of Merit in 1967 for his
dedicated and pioneering efforts in information science.
Another major Fairthorne style contribution was his article "Morphology
of Information Flow," which appeared in the Journal
of the ACM,
October 1967. Fairthorne discussed the limitations of Shannon's
information (or communication) theory, which considered the
transmission of information as a statistical phenomenon. To some it
seemed that Shannon's work could lead to development of a theoretical
foundation for information retrieval, but Fairthorne helped to
repudiate this belief. In the "Morphology... " paper, he identified two
triads, characterized as signaling
and discourse, which when
interconnected formed a hexagon of 20 different triads, which
Fairthorne labeled notification.
Two of the most familiar of those triads could be denoted as messages
held in a channel according to a classification system ("parking") and
the classification and notation system itself ("marking").
This contribution sparked additional efforts by colleagues in the
field. Specifically, in the Journal
of
Documentation,
June 1974, an issue dedicated to Robert Fairthorne on his 70th
birthday, we see a paper by Calvin Mooers, "Analysis of the hexagon of
notification"; one by Lea Bohnert, "Fairthorne's triads as an aid in
teaching information science"; and one by Harold Wooster, "Marking and
parking a sexist fable," a tongue-in-cheek spoof of
librarianship. I'm
sure Fairthorne enjoyed all of the contributions in that issue.
This list points up the esteem and affection we felt for Fairthorne as
scientist and friend. He was a witty and precise writer with a deep
respect for the language. He also had a great sense of humor, which
delighted all of us who knew him. I've already mentioned "Zipf
Unfastened" and "marking and parking." He chided us gently about our
foibles in our field and activities, particularly in "The Information
Revolution A Britisher's Perspective," which appeared in the Bulletin of the American Society for
Information Science,
September/October 1975. Consider, for example, "It is true that most
innovators are nuisances, but the converse is not true..." Or
"Punchedcard equipment ...was now applied to such informational tasks
as suited it... It was also applied to tasks that did not suit it...
because (it) had one huge advantage... It existed." Or again, "Rapid
growth of an information profession and a much greater information
industry at the same time generated all the problems that arise when an
activity becomes fashionable before it becomes understood." Again, "The
pragmatics of individual communication, exhortation, and persuasion,
under its older nonderogatory name of Rhetoric, is also at the heart of
clear and concise presentation, these days becoming a minority sport."
Yes, indeed, it behooved us to listen carefully.
Robert Fairthorne was 97 years old when he died and had been in failing
health for some time. We have to admit that he deserves his rest, but
we sure are going to miss him down here!
Madeline
M. Henderson
Mechanicsville, Maryland
If you have any comments, additions or modifications to the information on this page, please feel free to email me.
Created and maintained by:chris@ocotilloroad.com